Node:Arguments, Next:set & setq, Previous:Variables, Up:List Processing
To see how information is passed to functions, let's look again at our old standby, the addition of two plus two. In Lisp, this is written as follows:
(+ 2 2)
If you evaluate this expression, the number 4 will appear in your echo
area. What the Lisp interpreter does is add the numbers that follow
the +
.
The numbers added by +
are called the arguments of the
function +
. These numbers are the information that is given to
or passed to the function.
The word `argument' comes from the way it is used in mathematics and
does not refer to a disputation between two people; instead it refers to
the information presented to the function, in this case, to the
+
. In Lisp, the arguments to a function are the atoms or lists
that follow the function. The values returned by the evaluation of
these atoms or lists are passed to the function. Different functions
require different numbers of arguments; some functions require none at
all.1
It is curious to track the path by which the word `argument'
came to have two different meanings, one in mathematics and the other in
everyday English. According to the Oxford English Dictionary,
the word derives from the Latin for to make clear, prove
; thus it
came to mean, by one thread of derivation, `the evidence offered as
proof', which is to say, `the information offered', which led to its
meaning in Lisp. But in the other thread of derivation, it came to mean
`to assert in a manner against which others may make counter
assertions', which led to the meaning of the word as a disputation.
(Note here that the English word has two different definitions attached
to it at the same time. By contrast, in Emacs Lisp, a symbol cannot
have two different function definitions at the same time.)